Nevada Legislature Rolls Back Employee Protections Enacted by the Nevada Supreme Court

Business, News

A recent Nevada Supreme Court decision indicated greater protections may be on the horizon for Nevada employees and the Nevada Legislature has now passed a bill that seeks to remove those protections.  In Amazon.com Servs., LLC v. Malloy, the Nevada Supreme Court determined that the Portal-to-Portal Act’s (the “PPA”) exceptions related to excluding preliminary and postliminary work activities from compensation were not incorporated into Nevada’s state laws.  As a result, off-the-clock, employer required activities may now be considered compensable work.

The case involved a class action lawsuit against Amazon brought by Nevada employees, who sought compensation for the time they spent getting tested for COVID-19 prior to the start of their shifts.  Amazon sought to dismiss the case, relying on the PPA exceptions and arguing that the testing was a preliminary work activity.  The Nevada Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the PPA exceptions were not incorporated into Nevada’s wage and hour laws as the state statutes had specific exceptions that did not mirror the PPA.

 

Author

  • Ismail Amin

    Ismail’s legal experience encompasses serving Fortune 500 companies, mid-sized privately held companies, and entrepreneurs. He presently serves as Corporate and Litigation Counsel to large and mid-sized businesses throughout California, Nevada, Texas, North Carolina, and New York as well as General and Personal Counsel to high-profile hospitality operators in California and Nevada. Ismail’s practice emphasizes Business and Intellectual Property matters, with a focus on healthcare, biopharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and hospitality. Ismail has counseled the firm’s healthcare provider clients in acquiring or selling assets while maximizing return and minimizing risk. He has helped clients acquire or sell over $1 billion worth of healthcare-related assets, including hospitals.

    View all posts