Samuel S. Saltman

Associate

Samuel Saltman brings a sharp, litigation-focused perspective to complex commercial matters, combining more than a decade of dispute experience with a reputation for relentless advocacy and strong ethical standards. His background includes trial, appellate, academic, editorial, and teaching experience, giving him a practical command of legal strategy, written advocacy, and courtroom persuasion. Before entering private practice, Sam worked with organizations focused on civil liberties, immigration, and prosecution, experiences that continue to inform his disciplined and well-rounded approach to client advocacy.

Samuel's Representative Experience

In a three-week federal jury trial involving two former business partners alleging fraud and breach of fiduciary duty against each other, Obtained a $27 million verdict in his client’s favor, the highest jury verdict in the State of Arizona in 2016.

Appellate

In an ERISA case, I jointly wrote appellate briefs filed in the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which set favorable precedent in a published opinion (Mirza v. Insurance Administrator of America, Inc., 800 F.3d 129 (3d Cir. 2015)).

In another ERISA case in the Third Circuit that set precedent in a published opinion, I wrote the opening, reply, and supplemental briefs and argued before a three-judge appellate panel (Am. Ortho. & Sports Medicine v. Independence Blue Cross Blue Shield, et al., 890 F. 3d 445 (3rd Cir. 2018)).

Litigation – General Commercial

In a qui tam action under the False Claims Act alleging Medicare and Medicaid fraud, I represented a non-traditional whistleblower — an insurance company that claimed to have been previously defrauded under the same scheme — and successfully opposed the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The case later settled on favorable terms.

In a federal jury trial involving two former business partners alleging fraud and breach of fiduciary duty against each other, Obtained a $27 million verdict in his client’s favor, the highest jury verdict in the State of Arizona in 2016.

Litigation – Civil

Representing defendants in a civil RICO case, I obtained a dismissal of all claims against his clients, arguing that the plaintiff had only further undermined the legal sufficiency of its claims after amending the complaint for a fourth time.

Education

  • Rutgers University – Newark
    • Bachelor of Arts in English
      • Minor in Political Science
  • Rutgers University – Newark
    • Master of Science in Global Affairs
      • Concentration in Terrorism and Global Security
    • Copyeditor for the Journal of Global Change and Governance
  • Quinnipiac University School of Law
    • Juris Doctorate
    • Certified Legal Intern, Appellate Prosecution Clinic

Professional Licensure & Admissions

  • New York
  • New Jersey
  • District Court of New Jersey
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims
  • Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
  • Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Reported Cases

  • 27-35 Jackson Ave., LLC v. Samsung Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Ltd., 469 N.J. Super. 200 (App. Div. 2021), cert. denied, 250 N.J. 164 (2022)
  • Am. Orthopedic & Sports Med. v. Indep. Blue Cross Blue Shield, 890 F.3d 445 (3d Cir. 2018)
  • Wichansky v. Zoel Holding Co., Inc., 702 Fed. Appx. 559 (9th Cir. 2017) (unpublished)
  • State v. McCormack, 33 A.3d 264, 132 Conn. App. 490 (Conn. App. 2011)

Samuel's Recent Posts

No results found.